Report
from Augusta:
No thaw in sight for Maine's frigid business climate
If
any further evidence of Maine’s continued hostility toward business
were needed, the Maine Development Foundation recently released its 2004
edition of the annual Measures of Growth. Of the seven measures listed
under “Business Climate,” four are given “red flags” which
indicate issues that “particularly need attention.” There
are only five other red flags in the entire document, which contains
measures of nearly 50 other indices of economic and community growth.
With findings like these, one might think extra care would have been
taken this session to ensure that business climate is at least made no
worse, and at best, improved. No such luck.
Among the most appalling failures identified in the report is the stunning
rise in cost of doing business. When the benchmarks were established
in 1997, the hope was that Maine’s cost of business would drop
from 106 on a scale where the U.S. average is 100, to 103 by 2005. By
2002, the latest year with data, the Maine score had instead risen to
110, 8th highest in the nation. In the words of the report itself, “cost
of doing business has increased 4 percent over the past five years. This
represents a serious competitive disadvantage for Maine-based businesses.” From
labor costs to energy costs to tax and regulatory burden, the cost of
being in business continues to climb.
How did the legislature do this past session with regard to this measure?
While several business-hostile bills were mercifully defeated, many were
passed. Most notably was the expansion of unemployment to cover part-time
workers, a provision that the Labor Department predicts will ultimately
cost $60 million over the next decade. A recently-passed bill would allow
private contractors in the forest industry to organize, much like a union
and seemingly in violation of anti-trust laws, in order to pry concessions
from large landowners. In such ways, the costs of business continue to
climb.
Another notable measure in the report was the state and local tax burden.
The report measures total tax burden per $1,000 of income, and compares
Maine against the rest of New England. It will come as no surprise to
taxpayers here that Maine exceeds the New England average by $26 per
$1,000 of income. When the benchmark was set in 1992, it was hoped that
the gap would narrow to less than $7 by 2005. Doesn’t look like
we’ll make it.
And how did the legislature do on this measure? The governor made a commitment
not to raise broad-based taxes during his tenure, and, if you define “broad-based” taxes
as sales and income taxes, he has kept to his word. Unfortunately, fees
were increased on any number of services, instead, including corporate
filing fees and myriad licensing fees.
Worse still the failure of the
legislature to enact any kind of property tax reform means no relief
in sight for Maine’s most hated tax. Limited state spending on
schools means local taxes to support them will have to rise, meaning,
ironically, property tax increases. It is unlikely that we made much
progress on this issue.
Yet another Session of legislative misdeeds such as these should reinforce
for business owners the notion that serious change is needed in Augusta.
The good work of the Maine Economic Research Institute (available at
www.me-ri.org) provides business owners with all the information they
need to know who is friendly to Maine’s businesses and who is not.
As candidates prepare for the June primaries and come looking for support,
be sure to see where they stand on making Maine a more business-friendly
state. Let’s hope the next “Measures of Growth” tells
a different story.
Stephen L. Bowen <repbowen@earthlink.net> has
just completed his first term as House Representative from Rockport-Camden.
He is a regular contributor to the Midcoast Review.
Legacy of the 121st legislature:
No real improvement for Maine business
In a feature story about the Maine Economic Research Institute
which we published two years ago, Ed McLaughlin, president
of the non-partisan organization, offered the following observations.
“Maine must become more friendly to the entrepreneur as well, McLaughlin
contends. The state can achieve that goal by not only lowering taxes, but also
reducing the start-up burden and streamlining the permitting process. And, he
says that stability is of the utmost importance. There mustn’t be a total
change of philosophy and policy with every election. That kind of erratic course
makes long range planning for business practically impossible.” The Midcoast
Review, March, 2002.
In adding our concurrence to Steve Bowen’s assessment of the disappointing
legislative session which just concluded in Augusta, we would call your attention
to the sentence above which we have italicized. The Dirigo Health Plan has yet
to prove itself. Pine Tree Zones seem promising, but also are unproven. We certainly
don’t expect guarantees, but the 121st session did nothing to create
stability for anyone in the state, particularly not business. Forecasting
and projecting plans for business are cast into limbo while the dithering
continues. Meanwhile the MMA and Palesky referenda are free to gain momentum
for the June and November elections.
We sincerely trust that the electorate will carefully note who has done,
or more importantly, has not done what and vote accordingly in November. —Editor
|
|