Additional Articles for Sept/Oct 2004 Issue


Republican Legislators draft response to Democrat plan


The area’s Republican legislators responded favorably to the release by House Democrats of a Small Business Bill of Rights, but countered with their own plan that they say is more what businesses in Maine need from Augusta. “We welcome the Democrat leadership’s newfound interest in the success of small business,” said Rep. Stephen Bowen (R-Rockport), “and I hope that we really can work with them to make some positive things happen for Maine businesses for a change.”

Bowen and Rep. Chris Rector (R-Thomaston), co-authors of a draft response to the Democrat plan, made clear, though, that more is needed to make business work in Maine than what is proposed in the House Democrat plan. “The businesses I talk to really only want three simple things from Augusta,” said Rector. “They want us take less of what they make, listen more to what they have to say, and, most importantly get out of their way—don’t try to help, just get out of the way.”

To that end, Bowen and Rector worked with business leaders over the past couple of weeks to develop a business plan of their own, which they say is closer to what the state’s businesses really need. They hope to take the preliminary plan to colleagues in the Legislature and then work in the next session to fine tune the plan and get it passed.

Draft plan for Maine Businesses


Take less from Maine businesses

Small business success is about more then just taxes and other business costs, but money is the lifeblood of business growth and survival. Money a small business keeps can be reinvested to foster growth, can be spent on new technologies that make a business cleaner and safer, can be spent providing employees with better pay, benefits, and working conditions. If the Legislature and State Government spent less time taking money away from small businesses and more time helping small businesses be successful, the Maine economy would be better off and there would be more money all around. With this thinking in mind, we advocate the following specific changes:

  • Phase out the personal property tax on business equipment. This tax discourages small business investment and forces businesses to incur high costs for record keeping and compliance.
  • Reform the income tax. Maine’s regressive income tax is regularly identified as an impediment to business growth. Most small businesses proprietorships, farms, and small corporations pay business income taxes through the individual income tax and they pay some of the highest tax rates in the nation and at low income thresholds. Small businesses need to keep more working capital for investment, job creation and survival against fierce corporate and international competition.
  • Conform to the Federal tax code for the death tax. Family business owners and investment dollars are moving out of state because of Maine’s failure to comply with federal changes that has made dying in Maine more expensive than dying elsewhere.
  • Restore small business expensing and depreciation tax conformity. Small business owners are being forced to comply with two different sets of tax depreciation laws, which costs extra money in state taxes and compliance, and they are denied extra income that could be used for investment, employee wages and benefits, and other increasing business costs. These backdoor tax increases hamper the small business job creation machine.
  • Reform regulations regarding health insurance, to drive down costs for employers who provide health coverage or who want to. Similar insurance policies are cheaper in other states, often a great deal cheaper. Maine needs insurance reform to cut insurance costs, not a costly new state program, and Maine should embrace Health Savings Accounts as a way of cutting health care costs further for employers and workers.
  • Undertake a reform effort to reduce Workers’ Compensation costs. Workers’ Compensation premiums are a direct tax on jobs and wages. And Maine’s Workers’ Compensation system still ranks among the most expensive in the nation.
  • Enact lawsuit abuse reform legislation to protect small business from meritless lawsuits and to cut liability insurance costs.

Listen more to Maine businesses

Too many people involved in state government have little idea what it takes to run a small business, and while large employers can afford costly representation in Augusta and gain easy access to powerful state officials, small business is often without a voice or advocate within state government. To give small business a strong voice in the Capitol, we advocate the following:

The creation of an Office of Business Research and Analysis within state government, under the jurisdiction of the legislature and on par with the Office of Fiscal & Program Review (OFPR) and the Office of Policy & Legal Analysis (OPLA). Such an office will provide non-partisan research on the impact on small business of proposed legislation and track the impact of such legislation over time. This office can be created by redirecting existing resources already available within OPLA and OFPR.

The creation of an Office of Small Business Ombudsman, independent of the Executive Branch and tasked with being an advocate for small businesses in their dealings with state agencies. This office can also be created within existing resources.

A constitutional amendment requiring that any proposed legislation which imposes an unfunded mandate on small businesses be approved by a 2/3 majority of both houses of the legislature, as is the case now for unfunded mandates on municipalities. The legislature should ensure that additional state-imposed costs for small businesses have bipartisan support.


Get out of the way of Maine businesses


Too often, the state makes doing business in Maine harder than it has to be. Substantial work needs to be done to cut regulatory and paperwork burdens and in general change the state’s attitude toward small business. The last things we need, though, are more state programs to help small businesses. Instead, to make Maine friendlier toward business, we advocate the following:

  • Repeal of recent re-sale certificate. This 2004 tax law imposes high costs and considerable inconvenience on small business, while gaining the state virtually nothing.
  • Repeal the new Service Provider tax, which, though not a new tax, requires separate record-keeping and is therefore yet another burden on those businesses it affects.
  • Review of existing tax and regulatory burdens with an eye to identifying additional examples of wasteful regulations such as the tax law changes mentioned above.
  • Enactment of a Paperwork Reduction Act that requires state agencies to regularly submit their paperwork requirements to the Legislature for review and analysis. The Legislature’s Office of Small Business Research shall make recommendations for ways paperwork and other regulatory burdens may be reduced.
  • Force state agencies to coordinate permitting processes so that businesses expansion is simplified and encouraged rather than discouraged.
  • Require the new Office of Small Business Ombudsman to submit an annual report grading state agencies on their dealings with small business, based on feedback collected from such businesses, and reported in report card format for use by the legislature and the public. Business-hostile state agencies and employees should be identified and dealt with.



 
 
Back to Top